Raw materials for Dairy cow feeds
The top ten most frequently asked questions about mycotoxins, cattle and dairy food products
Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by fungi (molds). Secondary metabolites are chemicals produced by the fungus that are not essential for growth. Mycotoxins are chemically diverse, represent a variety of chemical families, and range in molecular weight from c. 200 to 500.
A practical definition of a mycotoxin is a fungal metabolite that causes an undesirable effect in exposed animals. The undesirable effect or disease caused by a mycotoxin is a mycotoxicosis (Nelson et al., 1993). Exposure is generally through consumption of contaminated feedstuffs, although dermal contact or inhalation of certain mycotoxins can also cause undesirable responses. Mycotoxins exhibit broad and variable biological effects in animals. Mycotoxins can cause damage to organ systems, reduce production and reproduction and increase disease by reducing immunity.
Some mycotoxins are carcinogens. Some target the   liver, the kidney,  the digestive tract or the reproductive system.   Symptoms are wide  ranging including decreased feed consumption, poor   feed utilization,  weight loss, reduced performance, estrogenic effects,   vomiting,  diarrhea, nervous disorders, tissue necrosis, hemorrhage,   tumors,  abortions and death.
Do molds cause animal problems or do molds simply produce mycotoxins for that purpose?
There is no confirmed reason for the existence of mycotoxins. Most  theories    suggest that mycotoxins     exist to protect or enhance the  existence of the fungus.     Recent speculation is that mycotoxins  increase the    ability of the mycotoxin-producing fungus to cause     a  plant disease, thus helping to create an environment     conducive for  growth of the fungus (CAST, 2003).     In experiments, Fusarium  graminearum and F. verticillioides were genetically    altered so that  they     would not produce trichothecenes or fumonisins,      respectively. Results were mixed, demonstrating that    trichothecenes  play an important role in wheat head    blight and corn ear rot caused  by F. graminearum    (Desjardins and Hohn, 1997; Harris et al., 1999),     but that fumonisins are not required for corn ear rot    caused by F.  verticillioides (Desjardins et al., 2002).
It is also possible that immune suppression in animals by certain  mycotoxins    is in fact a mechanism    to allow infectivity by the  fungus. Some fungi are    infectious pathogenic agents that cause a  mycosis     (fungal infection) that has a detrimental effect on    the  host animal. Aspergillus fumigatus is thought to    be a fairly common  mold in both hay (Shadmi et al.,    1974) and silage (Cole et al.,  1977). Aspergillus    fumigatus has been proposed as the pathogenic  agent    associated with mycotic hemorrhagic bowel syndrome    in dairy  cattle, which has also been attributed to    Clostridial infections and  other factors (Puntenney    et al., 2003). Such mycoses occur in  immunosuppressed    animals. Dairy cows are immune    suppressed in  early lactation. Aspergillus fumigatus    also produces a mycotoxin,  gliotoxin, which is an    immune suppressant. It is possible that immune     suppression by gliotoxin is a mechanism that allows    infectivity  by the fungus. Gliotoxin was found in    peritoneal lavages from mice  innoculated and infected    with A. fumigatus (Eichner et al., 1988).  Gliotoxin    has also been found in the udder of cows naturally     infected with A. fumigatus, while other known    mycotoxins produced by  this fungus were absent    (Bauer et al., 1989). Interactions with  trichothecene    mycotoxins may also be a factor in occurrence of a     mycosis because reductions in cellular immunity can    reduce resistance  to a mycosis. Niyo et al. (1988a,    b), showed that rabbits exposed to  T-2 toxin had a    decrease in phagocytosis of Aspergillus fumigatus     conidia by alveolar macrophages and an increase in    severity of  experimental aspergillosis. Richard (1991)    has suggested that medical  mycologists should consider    this aspect of infections caused by any  toxigenic    fungus, especially those that produce immunosuppressive     compounds. Fungal pathogens include    Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida  albicans, Candida    vaginitis and certain species of Fusarium.
Fungi are deterioration organisms. Therefore, feedstuffs on which they  grow    are deteriorated and    have an altered nutritional value  including decreases    in fat, protein and carbohydrates, which can  affect    performance and health (DiConstanzo et al., 1995).    Cook and  Wu (1991) itemized some of the nutritional    changes in feeds  occurring with mold growth    including a decrease in lysine and thiamin  and an     increase in fiber. Some of the interactions of mycotoxins  with nutrients have    been reviewed    (Schaeffer and Hamilton, 1991).
How many mycotoxins exist – how frequently are they found?  
Hundreds of mycotoxins have been identified, but other than the major  mycotoxins,    most have not been    extensively researched and even  fewer have good    methods of analysis available. The major classes of     mycotoxins are aflatoxins, zearalenone, trichothecenes,    fumonisins,  ochratoxin A and the ergot    alkaloids. These mycotoxins are the more  likely    causes of mycotoxicoses in dairy cattle and other     domestic  animals because they occur more frequently and have the potency to     cause toxicities. However,    there are many reports of mycotoxicoses  that have    occurred as a result of those mycotoxins that are     categorized as minor in importance (CAST, 2003;    Lacey, 1991).
Riley (1998) put forth an argument that only a small proportion of  mycotoxins    have yet been    identified. One factor that supports this  idea is the    high rate of discovery of new mycotoxins. To further     support this idea, Riley (1998) cited the following    facts, which we  have taken the liberty to condense.     Riley (1998) noted that  Hawksworth (1991) estimated that there may be as many    as 1.5 million  fungal    species in the world, but only about 69,000 are    currently  identified. Turner (1978) and Turner and     Aldridge (1983), catalogued  3200 secondary metabolites produced by 1600 fungal    species, or two     secondary metabolites per fungal species. Cole and    Cox (1981)  classified 10% of the fungal secondary    metabolites as mycotoxins. If  there are indeed 1.5    million fungal species and if each produces two     secondary metabolites and if 10% of secondary    metabolites are  mycotoxins, there are potentially    300,000 mycotoxins. More  conservatively, if there    are 100,000 fungal species producing 200,000     secondary metabolites, there may be 20,000    mycotoxins in nature.  Potentially, many more     mycotoxins exist than have been identified.     The potentially large number of    unidentified    mycotoxins and the  fact that commercial laboratory    analyses are not available for many  of the identified    mycotoxins suggests that a mycotoxicosis can occur     without any possibility of identifying the mycotoxin,    or all of  the mycotoxins, that may be interacting to    produce the mycotoxicosis.
The frequency of the occurrence of mycotoxins and the proportion of  feeds that    are contaminated indicate    that animal exposure is high.  The FAO has suggested    that 25% of the world’s crops are affected  (CAST,    1989). Certainly raw agricultural products are more    likely  to be contaminated than the human food supply.    Mycotoxins are present  worldwide with some    geographical differences mainly resulting from     climatic differences. There are differences in    mycotoxins by type  of feedstuff. Occurrence and    concentrations are variable by year,  which is expected    because of the annual variation in weather  conditions    and plant stresses known to affect mycotoxin    formation  (Coulumbe, 1993). Summaries of surveys    showing the incidence and  concentrations of    mycotoxins in various feedstuffs have been  published    (CAST, 2003; Wood, 1992; Wood and Trucksess,    1998). Feed  samples submitted by North Carolina    farmers over a 13 year period  (Table 1) indicate that    mycotoxins in feeds occur commonly at  unsuitable    concentrations (Whitlow et al., 1998). It can be     concluded that mycotoxins occur frequently in a    variety of feedstuffs  and are routinely fed to animals.
Table 1. Mycotoxin occurrence by concentration in all feeds submitted for analysis by North Carolina farmers over 13 years.
| Aflatoxin | Deoxynivalenol | Fumonisin | T-2 Toxin | Zearalenone | |
| Number of samples | 3266 | 5053 | 822 | 5136 | 4563 | 
| Low, % of samples below (concentration) | 6.4 (<20 ppb) | 18.2 (<500 ppb) | 32.6 (<5000 ppb) | 1.5 (<100 ppb) | 7.1 (<300 ppb) | 
| High, % of samples above (concentration) | 4.0 (>19 ppb) | 28.2 (>499 ppb) | 9.4 (>4999 ppb) | 6.6 (>99 ppb) | 8.3 (>299 ppb) | 
What conditions support mold growth and mycotoxin formation?
Perhaps the major mycotoxin-producing fungal genera, in terms of    research in the United States, are Aspergillus, Fusarium, and    Penicillium. Many species of these fungi produce mycotoxins in a variety    of feedstuffs. Claviceps spp. particularly in small grains and  Epichloe   and Neotyphodium in fescue grass all produce ergot alkaloids.  These   fungi and their mycotoxins are also a concern, but have a more  specific   host-fungal relationship than do Aspergillus, Fusarium, and  Penicillium   fungi. Molds are fungi that grow in multicellular  colonies, as compared   with yeasts that are single cellular fungi.  Molds can grow and   mycotoxins can be produced pre-harvest or during  storage, transport,   processing, or feeding. Mold growth and mycotoxin  production are related   to weather extremes (causing plant stress or  excess hydration of stored   feedstuffs), to inadequate storage  practices, to low feedstuff quality,   and to faulty feeding conditions.  In general, environmental conditions -   heat, water, and insect damage  - cause plant stress and predispose   plants in the field to mycotoxin  contamination. Because feedstuffs can   be contaminated pre-harvest,  control of additional mold growth and   mycotoxin formation is dependent  on storage management. After harvest,   temperature, moisture content,  and insect activity are the major factors   influencing mycotoxin  contamination of feed grains and foods (Coulumbe,   1993).
Molds grow over a temperature range of 10-40°C (50-104°F), a pH range    of 4 to 8, and above 0.7 aw (equilibrium relative humidity expressed  as a   decimal instead of a percentage). Mold can grow on feeds  containing   more than 12-13% moisture. In wet feeds such as silage,  higher moisture   levels help exclude air and molds grow only if oxygen  is available. The   conditions most suitable for mold growth may not be  the optimum   conditions for mycotoxin formation in the laboratory. For  example, the   Fusarium molds associated with alimentary toxic aleukia  have been   reported to grow prolifically at 25-30°C    without  producing much mycotoxin, but at near-freezing temperatures   large  quantities    of mycotoxins were produced with minimal mold growth  (Joffe, 1986).   Field applications    of fungicides may reduce mold  growth, in turn reducing the production   of mycotoxins.    However, the  stress or shock of the fungicide to the mold organism may   cause     increased mycotoxin production (Boyacioglu et al., 1992; Gareis and    Ceynowa,    1994).
Aspergillus species normally grow at lower water activities and at    higher temperatures than do the Fusarium species. Therefore, Aspergillus    flavus and aflatoxin in corn are favored by the heat and drought  stress   associated with warmer climates. Penicillium species grow at  relatively   low water activities and low temperatures and are  widespread in   occurrence. Penicillium molds are more common in storage  than in   preharvest, but can grow in the field under very wet  conditions. Because   both Aspergillus and Penicillium can grow at low  water activities, they   are considered storage fungi (Christensen et  al., 1977).
Growth of A. flavus can occur at 86-87% equilibrium relative humidity    (RH) (Davis and Diener, 1983). Field infection of corn with A. flavus    (Wicklow, 1983) is expected when temperatures, including nighttime    temperatures, are high and there is drought stress. Growth conditions in    the southern US result in routine aflatoxin contamination of crops,  but   aflatoxin can be found in crops grown in other regions in years  when   weather conditions are conducive. For example, 8% of samples of    midwestern US corn grain from the 1988 drought season contained    aflatoxin (Russell et al., 1991). Corn is susceptible to A. flavus    infection via the silks (Marsh and Payne, 1984) and stress conditions at    the time of anthesis (pollination) lead to preharvest aflatoxin    contamination in corn. A. flavus spores as inoculum are plentiful at    this time. In North Carolina, insect activity appears less important in    the events leading to aflatoxin contamination of corn than it appears  to   be in Georgia (Payne, 1983). Aflatoxin is a greater problem in    cottonseed grown in the southwestern US than in the southeastern US    (Ashworth et al., 1969). The complex effects of relative humidity,    temperature, precipitation, and their daily variations may interact to    produce conditions conducive to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin    production in the Southwest (Ashworth et al., 1969). Early harvest and a    decrease in late-season irrigation may reduce contamination (Russell  et   al., 1976). Experimentally, the use of spores of nontoxigenic A.  flavus   isolates in southwestern cotton fields has resulted in greatly  reduced   aflatoxin levels in cottonseed (Cotty et al., 1994).  Improperly stored   cottonseeds are susceptible to mycotoxin  contamination if mold activity   is allowed.
The Fusarium species are generally considered to be field fungi and    were thought to proliferate before harvest (Christensen et al., 1977).    However, Fusarium species may also grow and produce mycotoxins under    certain storage conditions. In corn, Fusarium molds are associated with    ear rot and stalk rot, and in small grains, they are associated with    diseases such as head blight or commonly referred to as scab (Tuite et    al., 1974). Fusarium is associated with excessive moisture at  flowering.   In corn, Fusarium diseases are more commonly associated  with a cool wet   growing season, with insect damage, warm conditions at  silking, and wet   conditions late in the growing season (Trenholm et  al., 1988).
Of the Fusarium species F. graminearum is a major producer of  deoxynivalenol    (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN), but other species of  Fusarium also produce DON    and ZEN, as well as other mycotoxins  (Christensen et al., 1988; Marasas et    al., 1984). Conditions  exacerbating ZEN accumulation in corn include weather    that holds  moisture content at 22- 25%, or delayed harvest (Abbas et al., 1988).     Zearalenone has been reported to occur in corn, other grains, and  silage in    many areas of the world. Weathered soybeans have also been  reported to be contaminated    with ZEN (Hagler et al., 1989). ZEN is  also found in wheat, barley, oats, sorghum,    sesame seed, hay, and  silages. DON occurs in cereal grains worldwide and can    increase in  stored grain with kernel moisture contents of 22–25%. Minimum tillage     and no tillage production are believed to increase the amount of  disease in    small grains and corn/wheat rotations because of increased  inoculum survival    on crop residue (Trenholm et al., 1988). T-2 toxin  is produced primarily by    F. sporotrichioides and F. poae, but is  also produced by other species of Fusarium    (Marasas et al., 1984).  T-2 (and DAS) is often found in barley, wheat, millet,    safflower  seed, and in mixed feeds.
How is a mycotoxicosis diagnosed?
Hamilton (1978) presented an interpretation of the application of  Koch’s postulates    to mycotoxins. The postulates as modified are:
1. Find the mycotoxin in suspect substrate from the toxicosis outbreak. 
2. Find in the substrate a fungus that produces the toxin. 
3. Induce the toxicosis in experimental animals by ingesting or contacting the toxin.
Once the mycotoxicosis is established as a disease entity, it is no    longer necessary to repeat the process. Recognition of the mycotoxicosis    symptoms and mycotoxin presence in feed provide an adequate basis for    diagnosis. If symptoms unique to that mycotoxin are observed, then it  is   not necessary to determine that the mycotoxin is in the feed.
Mycotoxins result in a progression and diversity of symptoms that can    be confusing and can make diagnosis difficult (Hesseltine, 1986;    Schiefer, 1990). Symptoms from field cases can be different from those    observed under controlled experimental conditions because in field  cases   there may be multiple mycotoxins, variable dosages at irregular    intervals, uncontrolled environments, and various interacting stress    factors. Diagnosis is complicated by a lack of research, by a lack of    feed analyses, by numerous possible mycotoxins, by nonspecific  symptoms,   and by immunosuppression resulting in opportunistic diseases  that   produce confounding symptoms. Therefore, a definitive diagnosis  of a   mycotoxicosis is difficult from general symptoms, specific tissue    damage, or even feed analyses. However, experience with    mycotoxin-affected herds greatly increases the probability of    recognizing a mycotoxicosis. A process of elimination of other factors,    coupled with feed analyses and unique symptoms can help identify a    mycotoxicosis. Another practice helpful in diagnosis is an observation    of positive responses or alleviation of symptoms after the use of    products known to be effective in reducing mycotoxin exposure to    animals. Examples of such products are mold inhibitors and mycotoxin    sequestering agents. Regardless of the difficulty of diagnosis,    mycotoxins should be considered as a possible cause of production and    health problems when pertinent symptoms exist and problems are not    directly attributable to other typical causes (Schiefer, 1990).
How do mycotoxins affect dairy cows?
Mycotoxins can increase incidence of disease and reduce production    efficiency. Some of the gross effects of mycotoxins can include: 
1) intake reduction or feed refusal, 
2) reduction in nutrient absorption and metabolism, 
3) digestive disorders including hemorrhage and necrosis, 
4) tissue and organ damage, 
5) gangrene of the extremities, 
6) endocrine effects, 
7) reproductive disorders, embryonic death, abortions, 
8) nervous disorders, tremors, uncoordination, 
9) suppression of the immune system, and 
10) death. 
Symptoms will be dependent on the mycotoxins present.     In the  field, animals experiencing a mycotoxicosis may exhibit a few or many     symptoms. They may simply be unthrifty, with a rough or dull hair coat,  have    an undernourished appearance, impaired reproduction, and(or) a  mixed infectious    disease profile. Some of the symptoms observed with a  mycotoxicosis may be    secondary, resulting from an opportunistic  disease that is present because    of immune suppression caused by the  mycotoxin exposure.
Toxicity occurs at the cellular level. Aflatoxin causes DNA changes,    cell deregulation, cellular changes and death. Deoxynivalenol inhibits    protein synthesis resulting in disruption of cytokine regulation,    altered cell proliferation and cell death. T-2 toxin inhibits protein    synthesis with subsequent cell death. Fumonisin alters enzyme activity,    which disrupts lipid metabolism resulting in cell deregulation and  cell   death. Zearalenone binds with cytosolic estrogen receptors  causing an   estrogenic response and altering hormonal control (Riley  and Norred,   1996).
AFLATOXINS
Aflatoxins are a family of extremely toxic, mutagenic, and    carcinogenic compounds produced by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus    (Deiner et a1., 1987; Kurtzman et al., 1987). Toxigenic A. flavus    isolates produce aflatoxins B1, and B2 and toxigenic A. parasiticus    isolates produce aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 (Cotty et al., 1994).
Symptoms of acute aflatoxicosis in mammals include inappetance,    lethargy, ataxia, rough hair coat, and pale, enlarged fatty livers.    Symptoms of chronic aflatoxin exposure include reduced feed efficiency    and milk production, icterus, and decreased appetite (Nibbelink, 1986).    Reduced growth rate may be the only clue for chronic aflatoxicosis  and   other mycotoxicoses (Raisbeck et al., 1991; Pier, 1992). The  mechanism   by which aflatoxins reduce growth rate is probably related  to   disturbances in protein, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (Cheeke  and   Shull, 1985).
Depending on interactions with other factors, aflatoxin concentrations    as low as 100 ppb may be toxic to dairy and beef cattle, however the    toxic level is generally considered to be between 300 to 700 ppb.    Garrett et al. (1968) showed an effect on weight gain and intake with    diets containing 700 ppb aflatoxin, but if increases in liver weights    are used as the criteria for toxicity, then 100 ppb would be considered    toxic to beef cattle. Guthrie (1979) showed a decline in reproductive    efficiency when lactating dairy cattle in a field situation were    consuming 120 ppb aflatoxin. When cows were changed to an aflatoxin-free    diet, milk production increased over 25%. Patterson and Anderson  (1982)   and Masri et al. (1969) also suggest that 100 ppb may reduce  milk   production.
Aflatoxin produced from culture was shown to be more toxic to dairy    cattle than pure aflatoxin added to diets (Applebaum et al., 1982). This    is thought to result from other mycotoxins present in the natural    culture. Under certain conditions, A. flavus also produces sclerotia, or    resting bodies, which contain indole alkaloids such as aflatrem    (Wicklow, 1983). Cyclopiazonic acid (CPA), a toxic indole tetramic acid,    is also produced by A. flavus (CAST, 1989). The role of these and  other   toxins produced by A. flavus in aflatoxicoses is not known.  Aflatoxin   lowers resistance to diseases and interferes with  vaccineinduced   immunity in livestock (Diekman and Green, 1992).
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established nonbinding    action levels as informal guidelines for enforcement of aflatoxin    control in feedstuffs (Table 2, Wood and Trucksess, 1998). Blending    contaminated ingredients with uncontaminated ingredients with the    purpose of reducing aflatoxin concentrations is not allowed.
Table 2. US Food and Drug Administration action levels for total aflatoxins in food and feed.
| Food or feedstuff | Concentration (ppb) | 
| All products, except milk, designated for humans | 20 | 
| Corn for immature animals and dairy cattle | 20 | 
| Corn and peanut products for breeding beef cattle, swine, and mature poultry | 100 | 
| Corn and peanut products for finishing swine (>100 lb) | 200 | 
| Corn and peanut products for finishing beef cattle | 300 | 
| Cottonseed meal (as a feed ingredient) | 300 | 
| All other feedstuffs | 20 | 
| Milk | 0.5a | 
| 
      
  | 
 |
ZEARALENONE
Zearalenone and zearalenol are estrogenic metabolites of several    species of Fusarium. Chemically, zearalenone (ZEN) is a resorcylic acid    lactone which does not have actual toxicity. Zearalenone is the cause  of   hyperestrogenism, the estrogenic syndrome, in swine. F. graminearum  is   the major ZEN-producing fungus of the Fusarium species that cause  corn   ear and stalk rots, but other species of Fusarium produce ZEN, as  well   as other mycotoxins (Christensen et al., 1988).
Zearalenone is rapidly converted to α− and ßzearalenol in rumen    cultures (Kiessling et al., 1984). α−Zearalenol is c. four-fold more    estrogenic in rats than ZEN, while ß-zearalenol is about equal in    strength to ZEN (Hagler et al., 1979). However, ZEN has been considered    of less importance to ruminants. Ruminal conversion of ZEN was found  to   be about 30% in 48 hrs (Kallela and Vasenius, 1982). A controlled  study   with nonlactating cows fed up to 500 mg of ZEN (dietary  concentrations   of about 40 ppm ZEN) showed no obvious effects except  that corpora lutea   were smaller in treated cows (Weaver et al.,  1986b). In a similar study   with heifers receiving 250 mg of ZEN by  gelatin capsule (dietary   concentrations of 25-30 ppm ZEN), conception  rate was depressed about   25%; otherwise, no obvious effects were noted  (Weaver et al., 1986a).   
Several case reports have related ZEN to an estrogenic response in ruminants and sometimes included abortions as a symptom (Kallela and Ettala, 1984; Khamis et al., 1986; Mirocha et al., 1968; Mirocha et al., 1974; Roine et al., 1971). Other cattle responses may include vaginitis, vaginal secretions, poor reproductive performance and mammary gland enlargement of virgin heifers. In a field study (Coppock et al., 1990), diets with about 750 ppb ZEN and 500 ppb DON resulted in poor consumption, depressed milk production, diarrhea, and total reproductive failure. New Zealand workers (Towers et al., 1995a,b; Sprosen and Towers, 1995; Smith et al., 1995) have successfully estimated intake of ZEN and its metabolites (ZEN+M) by measuring urinary ZEN and its metabolites which include zearalanone, α- and ß-zearalenol and α- and ß-zearalanol. ZEN+M intake predicted from urinary ZEN+M was associated with reproductive disorders in sheep and dairy cattle.
In sheep, ZEN+M was related to   lower conception,    reduced  ovulation, increased twinning rates and a 10 to 20 % decline   in  fertility    of ewes. With dairy cattle, herds with low fertility had  higher levels   of blood    and urinary levels of ZEN+M. Individual cows  within herds, examined by   palpation    and determined to be cycling,  had lower blood ZEN+M levels than did   cows that    were not cycling.  The reproductive problems in dairy cattle were   associated    with  ZEN+M concentrations of about 400 ppb in the pasture samples.
TRICHOTHECENES
Trichothecenes are a family of 200-300 related compounds that    apparently exert their toxicity through protein synthesis inhibition at    the ribosomal level. Several species of Fusarium and related genera    produce trichothecenes. T-2 toxin, diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), and DON are    commonly found in agricultural commodities (Desjardins et al., 1993).    However, except for DON, it appears that most contamination with T-2    toxin and DAS occurs post-harvest. The toxic effects of trichothecenes    include gastrointestinal effects such as vomiting, diarrhea, and  bowel   inflammation. Anemia, leukopenia, skin irritation, feed refusal,  and   abortion are also common. The trichothecenes, as a group, are    immuno-suppressive (Sharma, 1993).
DEOXYNIVALENOL
The impact of DON on dairy cattle is not established, but clinical  data show    an association between DON contamination of diets and poor  performance in dairy    herds, but without establishing a cause and  effect (Whitlow et al., 1994).    DON may therefore be a marker for  low-quality mycotoxin-contaminated feeds    in these herds. Other case  reports help substantiate an association of DON    with poor performing  dairy herds (Gotlieb, 1997 and Seglar, 1997). DON has    been associated  with reduced feed intake in nonlactating dairy cattle (Trenholm    et  al., 1985). There was a trend (P<0.16) for a 13% loss in 4% fat  corrected    milk in a study utilizing 18 midlactation dairy cows  (average 19.5 kg milk),    consuming diets shown to contain no common  mycotoxins other than DON which    was at levels of approximately 0, 2.7  and 6.5 ppm in treatment diets (Charmley    et al., 1993). Noller et  al. (1979) used 54 lactating dairy cows in a 3 x 3    latin square  experiment with 21-day feeding periods. Gibberella zeae (F. graminearum)     infected corn was used to provide estimated concentrations of 0,  1650 and 3300    ppb DON and 0, 65 and 130 ppb of ZEN in three  experimental diets. While neither    intake nor milk production (22.9  kg/d) were affected, cows that received contaminated    grain gained  significantly less weight. Conversely, Ingalls (1996) fed lactating     cows diets containing 0, 3.6, 10.9 or 14.6 ppm of DON for 21 days,  without    an apparent effect on feed intake or milk production (30  kg/d). DiCostanzo    et al. (1995), in a review of several individual  studies, concluded that beef    cattle and sheep can tolerate up to 21  ppm of DON without obvious deleterious    effects.
The FDA had provided an advisory for DON concentrations in wheat and    wheat-derived products (Table 3) (Wood and Trucksess, 1998).
T-2 TOXIN
T-2 toxin is produced primarily by F. sporotrichioides and F. poae,    but is also produced by other species of Fusarium (Marasas et al.,    1984). Data with cattle are limited, but the toxicity of T-2 toxin in    laboratory animals is well-documented (Wannemacher et al., 1991). T-2    toxin is a very potent mycotoxin associated with gastroenteritis,    intestinal hemorrhages (Petrie et al., 1977; Mirocha et al., 1976) and    death (Hsu et al., 1972; Kosuri et al., 1970). T-2 toxin fed to cattle    at 0.64 ppm for 20 days resulted in death and bloody feces, enteritis,    and abomasal and ruminal ulcers (Pier et al., 1980). Kegl and Vanyi    (1991) observed bloody diarrhea, low feed consumption, decreased milk    production and absence of estrus cycles in cows exposed to T-2. Weaver    et al. (1980) showed that T- 2 was associated with feed refusal and    gastrointestinal lesions in a cow, but did not show a hemorrhagic    syndrome. Serum immunoglobulins and certain complement proteins were    lowered in calves receiving T-2 toxin (Mann et al., 1983). Gentry et al.    (1984) demonstrated a reduction in white blood cell and neutrophil    counts in calves. A calf intubated with T-2 developed severe depression,    hindquarter ataxia, knuckling of the rear feet, listlessness and    anorexia (Weaver et al., 1980).
FUMONISINS
This family of mycotoxins is produced by the species of Fusarium in    the Liseola section. F. verticilloides (formerly F. moniliforme), a    species that is almost ubiquitous in corn, and F. proliferatum are the    main species producing high yields of fumonisins. Fumonisins B1, B2,  and   B3 (FB1, FB2, and FB3) are produced in fungal cultures or found in    naturally contaminated corn samples (Cawood et al., 1991). Feed  infected   with F. verticilloides has long been associated with  outbreaks of blind   staggers (equine leucoencephalomalacia, ELEM) in  equines (Wilson et   al., 1985). Fumonisin B1 was first isolated in  South Africa where F.   moniliforme has long been associated with animal  problems (Gelderblom et   al., 1988). Fumonisin has been shown to cause  leucoencephalomalacia in   horses (Marasas et al., 1988), pulmonary  edema in swine (Harrison et   al., 1990) and hepatoxicity in rats  (Gelderblom et al., 1991).   Fumonisins are structurally similar to  sphingosine, a component of   sphingolipids. Sphingolipids are in high  concentrations in myelin and in   certain nerve tissues. Fumonisin  toxicity is thought to result from   disruption of sphingolipid  biosynthesis (Riley et al., 1996). A USDA,   APHIS survey of 1995 corn  from Missouri, Iowa and Illinois found that   6.9% contained more than 5  ppm fumonisin B1 (Anon., 1995). Murphy et al.   (1993) reported  fumonisin concentrations in corn for the Iowa,   Wisconsin, and Illinois  crops. Incidence of contamination was greater   than 60% and  concentrations ranged from 0 to 37.9 ppm. Corn screenings   contained c.  10 times the fumonisin content of the original corn.
Table 3. US FDA advisory levels for deoxynivalenol in wheat-derived products. 1
| Product | Concentration (ppb) | 
| All finished wheat products, e.g. flour, bran and germ, for human consumption | 1 | 
| Grains and grain by-products destined for ruminating beef cattle and cattle in feedlots older than 4 months and for chickens (these ingredients should not exceed 50% of the diet)  | 
     10 | 
| Grains and grain by-products destined for swine  (these ingredients should not exceed 20% of the diet)  | 
     5 | 
| Grains and grain by-products for all other animals  (these ingredients should not exceed 40% of the diet)  | 
     5 | 
| 
      
  | 
 |
While FB1 is thought to be much less potent in ruminants than monogastrics, work by Kriek et al. (1981) suggested that fumonisin was toxic to sheep. Osweiler et al. (1993) fed young steers 15, 31 or 148 ppm fumonisin in a short term study (31 days). There were no significant effects on feed consumption or gain; however, there was a trend toward lower intake and weight gains for those fed 148 ppm. With the highest feeding level, there were mild liver lesions in calves, and the group had elevated liver enzymes indicative of liver damage. Lymphocyte blastogenesis was significantly impaired at the end of the feeding period in the group having the highest dose. Dairy cattle (Holsteins and Jerseys) fed diets containing 100 ppm fumonisin for approximately 7 days prior to freshening and for 70 days thereafter demonstrated lower milk production (6 kg/cow/day), explained primarily by reduced feed consumption. Increases in concentrations of serum enzymes suggested mild liver disease (Diaz et al., 2000). Dairy cattle may be more sensitive to fumonisin than are beef cattle, perhaps because of greater production stress.
Fumonisin has been shown to be carcinogenic in rats and mice (NTP, 1999), and has been associated with esophageal cancer in humans in China (Chu and Li, 1994) and South Africa (Rheeder et al., 1992). Therefore, fumonisin contamination has implications for human health, at least from a regulatory perspective. The FDA released guidance for fumonisin levels in human foods and animal feeds in late 2001 (Table 4).
OCHRATOXIN A
This mycotoxin is produced by species of Penicillium and Aspergillus, and is a causative agent of kidney disease in pigs that has been referred to as mycotoxin porcine nephropathy, producing symptoms including diarrhea, increased water consumption, diuresis and dehydration (Krogh, 1979). OTA is rapidly degraded in the rumen and thus thought to be of little consequence unless consumed by young pre-ruminant calves (Sreemannarayana et al., 1988).
CITRININ
Citrinin can co-occur with OTA, is produced by both Penicillium and Aspergillus, and like OTA targets the kidney (Kitchen et al., 1977). Symptoms of pruritis, pyrexia and hemorrhagic syndrome in a dairy herd were attributed to citrinin (Griffiths and Done, 1991).
PATULIN
Patulin is produced by Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Byssochlamys and may be found in silage (Dutton et al., 1984; Hacking and Rosser, 1981). Patulin has been incriminated as a possible toxin in Europe and New Zealand (Lacey, 1991).
PR TOXIN
Produced by Penicillium roquefortii, PR toxin has been found in silage (Hacking and Rosser, 1981) and was the suspected vector in a case study with symptoms of abortion and retained placenta (Still et al., 1972). Surveys of grass and corn silage in Europe have found P. roquefortii in up to 40% of samples (Auerbach, 2003).
Table 4. US FDA guidance for industry on fumonisin levels in human foods and animal feeds. 1
| Total fumonisins  (FB1+FB2+FB3) (ppm)  | 
 ||
| Human foods | ||
| Product | ||
| Degermed dry milled corn products (e.g., flaking grits, corn grits, corn meal, corn flour with fat content of < 2.25%, dry weight basis)  | 
     2 | |
| Whole or partially degermed dry milled corn products (e.g., flaking grits, corn grits, corn meal, corn flour with fat content of ≥ 2.25 %, dry weight basis)  | 
     4 | |
| Dry milled corn bran | 4 | |
| Cleaned corn intended for masa production | 4 | |
| Cleaned corn intended for popcorn | 3 | |
| Animal feeds | ||
| Corn and corn by-products intended for: | ||
| Equids and rabbits (no more than 20% of diet)2 | 5 | |
| Swine and catfish (no more than 50% of diet)2 | 20 | |
|       Breeding ruminants, breeding poultry and breeding mink and including lactating dairy  cattle and hens laying eggs for human consumption (no more than 50% of diet)2  | 
     30 | |
|       Ruminants ≥3 months old being raised for slaughter and mink being raised for pelt  production (no more than 50% of diet)b  | 
     60 | |
| Poultry being raised for slaughter (no more than 50% of diet)2 | 100 | |
| All other species or classes of livestock and pet animals (no more than 50% of diet)2 | 10 | |
| 
      
  | 
 ||
DICOUMAROL
Dicoumarol is produced from natural plant compounds when Penicillium    or Aspergillus molds grow on sweet clover or sweet vernal grass.    Dicoumarol interferes with the function of vitamin K, resulting in a    hemorrhagic syndrome. Moldy sweet clover poisoning is discussed by    Radostits et al. (1980).
ERGOT ALKALOIDS
One of the earliest recognized mycotoxicoses is ergotism caused by a  group    of ergot alkaloids. They are produced by several species of  Claviceps, which    infect the plant and produce toxins in fungal bodies  called sclerotia or ergots.    Ergotism primarily causes a nervous or  gangrenous condition in animals. Symptoms    are directly related to  dietary concentrations and include reduced weight gains,    reduced milk  production, and agalactia (Robbins et al., 1986). Sclerotia  concentrations    above 0.3% are related to reproductive disorders.  Fescue infected with Neotyphodium    or Epichloe may contain toxic  alkaloids associated with ‘fescue toxicity’ (CAST,    2003). Fescue is a  major pasture grass in the US, growing widely throughout    the lower  midwest and upper south. Over half of the fescue is endophyte-infected,     making this a serious problem for cattle and horse producers.  Endophyte-free    varieties are available, but they are not as hardy as  infected varieties. Fescue    infected with a nonpathogenic endophyte  may be more field hardy and less toxic.
Are dairy products contaminated when dairy cattle consume mycotoxins?
Moy (1998) reviewed the international efforts to evaluate and reduce    the human    risks of mycotoxins. He stated that “human health problems  caused by   the consumption of most mycotoxins are complex and poorly  understood”,    but they may be responsible for a range of diseases. The  majority of   human    health risk from mycotoxins is from consumption  of contaminated grains   and    nuts. While many mycotoxins are common  contaminants of feedstuffs and   several    mycotoxins have been shown  to occur in the milk of dairy cattle,   concentrations    are extremely  low because only a small fraction of the amount consumed   by a    cow  is transferred to milk in the parent form or as a derivative.    Aflatoxin    is the only mycotoxin that has received regulatory action  in the US as   a possible    contaminant in milk. This is because  aflatoxin transfer from feed to   milk is    greater than for other  mycotoxins. Also, aflatoxin is carcinogenic,   highly    toxic to  humans, and because milk is a primary component of the diet   of  infants.    The US FDA indicated that aflatoxin is the only mycotoxin  that   currently warrants    regulation in milk (Wood and Trucksess,  1998).
AFLATOXIN
Milk aflatoxin residues are the result of transformation of the parent    compound in the liver and its subsequent secretion into milk.  Aflatoxin   B1 results in milk residues of aflatoxin M1, while aflatoxin  B2 results   in milk residues of aflatoxin M2. Small amounts of other  derivatives   such as aflatoxin M4, Q1, and aflatoxicol can also be  found in milk;   however aflatoxin M1 is the primary residue (Wood,  1991). Van Egmond   (1989) concluded that aflatoxin carryover from feed  to milk is   approximately 1-2%.
Frobish et al. (1986) found greater aflatoxin transfer to milk when    the toxin was supplied by contaminated cottonseed meal than when it was    supplied by contaminated corn. Percentage transfer of aflatoxin to  milk   was not affected by concentration in the feed or by milk  production   level of the cow. They concluded that concentration of  aflatoxin M1 in   milk was approximately equal to 1.51% of the  concentration of aflatoxin   B1 in the diet. Therefore a concentration  of 33 ppb in the total diet   would result in a 0.5 ppb concentration in  milk (3.9 ppb in the milk dry   matter, assuming 12.8% milk solids).  Figure 1 shows the extent to which   four toxin adsorbents added to the  diet of dairy cows reduced aflatoxin   M1 in milk (Diaz et al., 1999).
Regulatory pressures and a widespread awareness have helped minimize    aflatoxin problems. Surveys of aflatoxin B1 concentrations in  feedstuffs   conducted during the 1980s resulted in lower levels than  for surveys   conducted in the 1970s (Van Egmond, 1989).
Figure 1. Effects of sequestering agents on milk aflatoxin residues (Diaz et al., 1999).

The United States General Accounting Office (GAO, 1991) concluded that    industry, federal and state programs are effective in detecting and    controlling aflatoxin and that it is doubtful that additional programs    or limits would reduce the risk of aflatoxin in the food supply. The  GAO   specifically examined the state-administered program in the state  of   Georgia as a part of its report. In 1989, 13% of corn samples  tested by   the Georgia Department of Agriculture exceeded 20 ppb. On  farms, 3.9% of   tested milk exceeded limits while at the retail level  only 0.4% of milk   was in violation. Current surveillance programs in  the US aimed at   reducing food residues make it very unlikely that  aflatoxin will be fed   at high enough levels and for sufficient  duration to have significant   production or health effects on dairy  herds in those regions that have   an active program.
Dairy cattle feeds should contain less than 20 ppb aflatoxin to    prevent milk residues above 0.5 ppb. Concentrations of aflatoxin should    be conservatively low because of uncertainties in sampling and  analysis,   nonuniform distribution of aflatoxin, and potential for more  than one   source of aflatoxin in the diet.
DEOXYNIVALENOL
DON is changed to DOM-1 in the rumen with estimates of 24 hr    degradation of    about 50% (King et al., 1984). Deoxynivalenol and  metabolites are   rapidly excreted,    primarily through urine (Côté et  al., 1986; Prelusky et al., 1984;   Prelusky et al., 1987). Prelusky et  al. (1984) administered DON in an   oral dose of 920 mg and found less  than 4 ppb of free and conjugated DON   in the milk. DON was excreted in  milk primarily as DOM-1, but excretion   rate is extremely low at  0.0001% of the dose. Côté et    al. (1986) found no DON, but up to 30  ppb of DOM-1 in milk of cows fed   DON    at about 300 mg/day (66 ppm)  for five days.
ZEARALENONE
Shreeve et al. (1979) fed dairy cows about 1 ppm zearalenone for 11    weeks without detecting a milk residue. Prelusky et al. (1990)    administered up to 6 g of zearalenone per cow daily and found a total    milk residue of up to 16 ppb, which represented about 0.01% of the dose.    Hagler et al. (1980) administered 5 g zearalenone in ground feed to a    lactating dairy cow that was milked twice daily with samples  collected   until 120 hr after dosing. Only trace levels of zearalenone  were found   in the milk obtained at 96, 108 and 120 hr after dosing and  trace levels   of zearalenol were also found in the milk at 108 and 120  hr after   dosing. Mirocha et al. (1981) found that zearalenone and its  metabolites   reached levels above 1 ppm in milk representing about  0.7% of the   zearalenone dosage, which was 25 ppm for eight days.
T-2 TOXIN
Residues of T-2 and its derivatives have been found in milk, but have a    low transfer rate from feed to milk. After 72 hrs, an orally    administered dose of T- 2 at 0.42 mg/kg of body weight (approximately 36    ppm) was almost completely excreted in the feces and urine (Yoshizawa    et al., 1981; Yoshizawa et al., 1982). Milk residues, which reached a    maximum of about 35 ppb, suggest that about 0.2% of T-2 and its    metabolites are secreted in milk. In the lactating cow administered    radioactive labeled T-2 toxin, three metabolites (3'-hydroxy-T-2 toxin,    3'-hydroxy-HT- 2 toxin and 3'-hydroxy-7-hydroxy-HT-2 toxin) accounted    for 30-40% of the radioactivity in urine, 60-70% of radioactivity in    milk and 50-60% of the radioactivity in blood plasma. Other metabolites    included HT-2 toxin, neosolaniol and 4- deacetylneosolaniol. Other    investigators (Robinson et al., 1979) have measured T-2 up to a peak of    160 ppb in milk on the fifth day after starting oral intubation with    daily doses of 182 mg of T-2 toxin for 15 consecutive days (equivalent    to about 9 ppm in the diet, assuming a daily consumption of 20 kg).
FUMONISIN
Fumonisin B1 carryover from feed to milk is thought to be negligible    (Richard et al., 1996; Scott et al., 1994). Prelusky et al. (1996)    reported studies where dairy cattle were administered fumonisin B1    either orally or intravenously. The oral dosages were approximately    equal to dietary concentrations of 60 to 300 ppm. The intravenous    dosages were stated to be similar to dietary concentrations of 125 to    500 ppm. No fumonisin B1 or its metabolites were detected in milk    (detection limit of 0.5 ppb for fumonisin B1). Maragos and Richard    (1994) analyzed 155 milk samples collected in Wisconsin during a period    when feeds were reported to be severely affected by mold.  Additionally,   10 samples were collected in Illinois. Feed samples  associated with   these milk samples were not collected and thus  fumonisin B1   concentrations in feed 























