Feeds for dairy cows
Plant extracts as antimicrobials in ruminants

Targets for manipulation
Breakdown of dietary protein
Dietary   protein entering the rumen is broken down in an apparently  uncontrolled   way, resulting in ammonia formation and subsequent loss  of N in the   urine. The low efficiency of nitrogen retention which  results represents   a major economic loss, causes metabolic stress in  the animal, and also   places a burden on the environment, in the form  of nitrogen-rich wastes.
Breakdown of microbial protein
Protozoa   consume large quantities of bacteria in the rumen. The  protein   breakdown which results causes the net yield of microbial  protein   resulting from rumen fermentation to be decreased by up to  50%. If the   protozoa could be suppressed, there would be less ammonia  formation and   less need for dietary protein supplementation.
Methane formation
Methane   is a greenhouse gas many times more potent than CO2. Its  concentration   in the atmosphere has doubled over the last century.  Ruminants are major   contributors to biogenic methane formation, and it  has been estimated   that preventing methane formation from ruminants  would stabilise   atmospheric methane concentrations. Decreasing methane  emissions would   also lead to improved energy retention in the animal.
Digestive disorders
Bloat   is a disorder in which the gases formed by fermentation are  prevented   from escaping because a stable foam forms in the rumen.  Lactic acidosis   occurs when a rapidly degraded feed is introduced too  quickly, or when   concentrates form a high proportion of the diet,  volatile fatty acid   production exceeds the buffering capacity of the  rumen, rumen pH falls,   and only lactic acid-producing bacteria can  grow.
Fatty acid biohydrogenation
Dairy   products and milk are generally considered to be unhealthy,  because   they are high in saturated fats. The aim of manipulation is to  increase   the content of health-promoting unsaturated fatty acids,  particularly   conjugated linoleic acids (CLA), in ruminant products by  controlling   biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen.
Searching for plants/extracts with a particular function
One   strategy is to focus on a target activity and screen a large  number of   samples for their influence on that activity. Projects of  this nature   are springing up in several countries. Three in which the  Rowett group   have been involved will be described. Investigation, in  collaboration   with the International Livestock Research Institute,  Addis Ababa, of the   effects of different possible 'multipurpose trees'  on protozoal   activity lead to the opportunity to use the foliage from  some trees,   including Sesbania sesban  and Enterolobium cyclocarpum, to
suppress   protozoal activity and thereby to improve microbial protein  flow from   the rumen (Teferedegne et al, 1999). The active agent was  subsequently   found to be saponins.
Rumenup (QLK5-CT-2001-00992) 2001-2005 : New plants  and plant extracts to decrease methane and nitrogenous   emissions from  ruminants and to alleviate nutritional stress was a   Framework 5  project, whose aim was to develop new plants or plant   extracts as  dietary supplements for ruminants to replace chemical   additives and  growth-promoting antibiotics. Five hundred plant materials   were  collected from botanical and industrial collections on the basis   of  known secondary metabolites and/or traditional uses in, for example,    herbal medicine. All samples were screened in vitro for their    effectiveness in inhibiting rumen ciliate protozoa, rumen proteolysis,    methane formation, microbial protein synthesis, lactic acidosis and    bloat. The samples were also investigated to ensure that potentially    useful samples had no detrimental effect on the other basic functions of    the fermentation, such as fibre digestion and volatile fatty acid    production.
A total of 23 samples was identified to have   potential for  development as feed additives which could manipulate   fermentation in  one or more of the target areas without having   detrimental effects on  overall fermentation (Becker et al, 2005).   Several plants appeared to  hold particular promise, namely Knautia arvensis (field scabious) in suppressing ruminal proteolysis, Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle), Gentiana asclepidea (willow gentian) and Bellis perennis (daisy) in inhibiting the activity of rumen ciliate protozoa, and Urtica dioica (stinging nettles) and Lactuca sativa  (lettuce) in stabilising ruminal pH. The activity of the antiprotozoal    plants was almost certainly due to their saponins. However, the active    component of the others is not known. The antiproteolytic activity of  K. arvensis was noteworthy, because unlike many other samples  that were inhibitory   to proteolysis, it contained no tannins, and its  effect was adaptive   rather than acute.
A Framework 6 project is using the same   resource in terms of  (recollected) plant materials and the knowledge   gained in Rumen-up to  broaden the animal species range and to explore   other applications in  ruminants. This project is called REPLACE (Food-CT-2004-506487) :  Plants and their extracts and other natural alternatives to    antimicrobials in feeds. The properties being targeted in ruminants    include control of parasites, fatty acid biohydrogenation and forage    digestion. Chrysanthemum coronarium has been identified as a candidate additive to improve milk fatty acid composition.
Starting with the plant extract: what does it do?
In   several cases, our approach has been to take an extract already  in   common use and to find out what it does to ruminal fermentation and    ruminal microorganisms. Historically, this is how ionophores were    investigated. Nutritionists used the ionophores before the mode of    action in manipulating ruminal fermentation was known. The same approach    has been taken with a few plant extracts (Wallace, 2004). Saponins,    investigated mainly as sarsaponin, suppress the bacteriolytic activity    of rumen ciliate protozoa and thereby enhance total microbial protein    flow from the rumen (Cheeke, 1998). The effects of some saponins seems    to be transient, which may stem from the hydrolysis of saponins to  their   corresponding sapogenin aglycones, which are much less toxic to    protozoa. Saponins also have selective antibacterial effects which may    prove useful in, for example, controlling starch digestion (Wang et  al.   2000). Essential oils cause rates of NH3 production from amino  acids in   ruminal fluid taken from sheep and cattle receiving the oils  to   decrease, yet proteinase and peptidase activities were unchanged    (McIntosh et al, 2003). Hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria were the most    sensitive of ruminal bacteria to essential oils in pure culture.    Essential oils also slowed colonisation and digestion of some    feedstuffs. Ruminobacter amylophilus  may be a key organism in    mediating these effects. Busquet et al. (2005) noted that garlic oil    inhibited methane formation. Tannins bind to protein and may be used to    slow the degradation of those proteins which are degraded too rapidly  in   the rumen (Waghorn and McNabb, 2003).
Conclusion
The   plant kingdom contains an almost unlimited number of plants and    chemical compounds that could be used to manipulate undesirable aspects    of ruminal fermentation and to promote the more desirable activities.    Well known classes of chemicals, such as saponins, essential oils and    tannins, have already been investigated in some detail, but others  which   are less well known or not identified to date may be useful.    Nevertheless, a major obstacle to commercialization in the EU is the    hurdles to be surmounted in the regulatory process. This is a major    disincentive to truly innovative uses for plants or their extracts in    ruminant feeding.






















